Mr. Jacobs questions Minister of Education about school board funding levels
The following is copied from the February 17, 2010 printed transcripts of the Legislative debate and discussion.
Mr. Jacobs (Cardston-Taber-Warner PC): Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Our rural school board in my constituency is facing an $850,000 shortfall in
the 2010-11 school year despite the announcements by the Minister of Education
that school boards will receive a zero per cent increase. I don’t know if
zero per cent is an entirely correct figure as I have heard that school
boards will in fact receive an overall budget decrease of over 4.17
per cent, 1.17 per cent in 2009-10 and approximately 3 per cent in
2010-11, due to the lack of funding for this government’s negotiated
settlement with the ATA. My question to the Minister of Education:
when will the government provide the funding for the agreement that
they negotiated?
Mr. Hancock (Edmonton-Whitemud PC): Well, Mr. Speaker, first
of all, in this budget this year – and we’ll go into it more during estimates – we
have provided the same amount for school boards as last year, no increase in
budgets overall, although there will be some adjustments between school
boards based on the number of students they have, based on
increased enrolment, based on changes in transportation, and based
on changes in the class size funding.
With respect to salaries the member is absolutely correct. There
are agreements in place with the ATA locals which provide for an
adjustment based on average weekly earnings, and we’ve had an
arbitrated process.
The Speaker: The hon. member.
Mr. Jacobs: Thank you. Again to the Minister of Education.
Because of the budget shortfall boards will have to make significant
cuts to staffing in the upcoming year and will face public outcry as
the current information does not indicate the deficit created by the
government’s lack of commitment to the agreement with the ATA.
Question: why did the government fail to budget for teachers’ salary
increases at the more prudent figure of 5.9 per cent?
Mr. Hancock: Well, Mr. Speaker, the average weekly earnings
index at the end of 2008 was 4.82 per cent. At the end of March
Stats Canada changed the way they calculated the index, and that
change resulted in the 5.99 figure. That was not something we could
budget for because the budget was already prepared. However, there
was also a dispute with respect to interpretation as to whether the
index should be what they had previously calculated or what they
changed it to. We went through an arbitrated process. We didn’t
win that, unfortunately, so now we have an index that’s certain, but
we haven’t budgeted the money for it.
The Speaker: The hon. member.
Mr. Jacobs: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Again to the same minister.
In addition to the shortfall due to the government’s salary settlement
with the ATA, boards will also face increased costs for support staff,
benefits, grid movement, and increases due to inflation. Without
additional funding in the current budget school boards will be forced
to either make significant program and staff cuts or submit deficit
budgets. Question to the minister: does the minister envision school
boards submitting deficit budgets to maintain the current educational
programs being offered to students in Alberta?
Mr. Hancock: Well, the good news, Mr. Speaker, is that school
boards across this province are in great financial shape. There are
close to $360 million in operating reserves. Yes, those monies have
been saved for specific purposes, but they’re in good shape to
manage through this year. I’ve asked school boards to bear with us.
We now have the arbitration in place, so we know the index that
we’re dealing with. I will have to work with the ATA and the
Alberta School Boards Association school boards with respect to the
salary issue over a longer term process so that we can make them
whole over a longer term if we can’t in the short term. In the
meantime they have the resources in their operating reserves. (150 – 151)
(The opinions expressed in viewer comments are not necessarily those of the Association or any of its members.)
I appreciate Mr. Jacob’s questions about the practical implications of the budget that has been passed. I am curious about the implications of the Minister’s response regarding the operating reserves held by jurisdictions however.
For a board that does not hold significant operating reserves, the reality is that cuts are necessary. Is this a situation that is recognized, with specific plans to address it, by the government?
Change starts with a conversation, and I’d really like to see this public conversation on this topic.I appreciate Mr. Jacob’s questions about the practical implications of the budget that has been passed. I am curious about the implications of the Minister’s response regarding the operating reserves held by jurisdictions however.
For a board that does not hold significant operating reserves, the reality is that cuts are necessary. Is this a situation that is recognized, with specific plans to address it, by the government?
Change starts with a conversation, and I’d really like to see this public conversation on this topic.